Atheist a-go-go
While driving down the highway to work today, I noticed a new billboard with a giant pro-Christian message on it. There didn't seem to be any advertisement to it...some Christian group must have just decided they wanted to spread the word of their God in some massive method.
As a tried and true believer in freedom of speech, I have no problem with this. Granted, I don't choose to kowtow to any God, but I don't begrudge those who do.
This got me to thinking, however, about how divergent the messages of the godly and the godless are. Someone who believes in a God can put up a sign beside the highway, and because their message is a positive one, they are allowed such freedom. The atheist/humanist side of the coin has a problem, however. Their position is not to trumpet the existence of their own holy entity, but to discredit the idea of an entity even existing. This puts them in a rather poor position - one that always looks negative and vindictive. I mean, imagine a sign beside the road that says, "There is no God. Get over it." This is a completely legitimate belief to the atheists, but it would never be allowed since it would be aligned with hate speech rather than free speech.
I happen to use StumbleUpon.com when I'm bored - and one of the things I have it feed me are atheist sites. Most of them spend a lot of time trying to present arguments that show how silly the beliefs of Christianity are. Of course, a Christian who came across such a site would be terribly offended. However, when a Christian spouts off about how great their religion and God is, they are allowed to do so with impunity. Again, the Christian view always looks positive and good, while the atheist view looks like sour grapes.
Therefore, I thought atheism needs a marketing spin so they can say things with a positive slant rather than their typical "religion sucks" view. But the more I thought about it, the more I discovered that the atheist point of view, when viewed against a religious one, is hopelessly doomed to looking negative! No matter how you present it, an atheistic view appears to be slagging religion. I mean if an atheist says:
"Think for yourself." (a positive atheist message)
The religious would hear it as:
"Religious people are mindless sheep."
If an atheist says,
"Atheism is cool."
It sounds like they're saying:
"Religion sucks."
Religion automatically has the high ground on this matter because they can talk about all the great things that religion provides, sounding like a celebration of their religion, but nothing of what they say sounds like a direct discrediting of atheism (unless you really want to twist it that way). Atheism, on the other hand, is founded on the idea that there is no God and therefore, it is naturally negative toward religion. This automatically makes atheists appear antagonistic (which, in fairness, they often are), which is a horrible PR position.
Which all comes to making me be quite impressed by how well-insulated religion is. Faith is quite simply unassailable. You can beat on it all you want with atheist logic, but true faith is very difficult to destroy. This is something that a religious person is very proud of...and that, in itself, reinforces the faith. Brilliant!
But I do find the double standard annoying. It's okay for someone to trumpet their religion loudly in public, but to trumpet one's non-religion (atheism) in public is considered bad form. No wonder there are so many angry atheists!
As a tried and true believer in freedom of speech, I have no problem with this. Granted, I don't choose to kowtow to any God, but I don't begrudge those who do.
This got me to thinking, however, about how divergent the messages of the godly and the godless are. Someone who believes in a God can put up a sign beside the highway, and because their message is a positive one, they are allowed such freedom. The atheist/humanist side of the coin has a problem, however. Their position is not to trumpet the existence of their own holy entity, but to discredit the idea of an entity even existing. This puts them in a rather poor position - one that always looks negative and vindictive. I mean, imagine a sign beside the road that says, "There is no God. Get over it." This is a completely legitimate belief to the atheists, but it would never be allowed since it would be aligned with hate speech rather than free speech.
I happen to use StumbleUpon.com when I'm bored - and one of the things I have it feed me are atheist sites. Most of them spend a lot of time trying to present arguments that show how silly the beliefs of Christianity are. Of course, a Christian who came across such a site would be terribly offended. However, when a Christian spouts off about how great their religion and God is, they are allowed to do so with impunity. Again, the Christian view always looks positive and good, while the atheist view looks like sour grapes.
Therefore, I thought atheism needs a marketing spin so they can say things with a positive slant rather than their typical "religion sucks" view. But the more I thought about it, the more I discovered that the atheist point of view, when viewed against a religious one, is hopelessly doomed to looking negative! No matter how you present it, an atheistic view appears to be slagging religion. I mean if an atheist says:
"Think for yourself." (a positive atheist message)
The religious would hear it as:
"Religious people are mindless sheep."
If an atheist says,
"Atheism is cool."
It sounds like they're saying:
"Religion sucks."
Religion automatically has the high ground on this matter because they can talk about all the great things that religion provides, sounding like a celebration of their religion, but nothing of what they say sounds like a direct discrediting of atheism (unless you really want to twist it that way). Atheism, on the other hand, is founded on the idea that there is no God and therefore, it is naturally negative toward religion. This automatically makes atheists appear antagonistic (which, in fairness, they often are), which is a horrible PR position.
Which all comes to making me be quite impressed by how well-insulated religion is. Faith is quite simply unassailable. You can beat on it all you want with atheist logic, but true faith is very difficult to destroy. This is something that a religious person is very proud of...and that, in itself, reinforces the faith. Brilliant!
But I do find the double standard annoying. It's okay for someone to trumpet their religion loudly in public, but to trumpet one's non-religion (atheism) in public is considered bad form. No wonder there are so many angry atheists!